next up previous 13 15 Note: this is Euclidean relativity, not Minkowski.
Next: 5 Current density Up: Minkowski versus Euclidean 4-vectors Previous: 3 Acceleration

4 Energy and momentum

Writing the Minkowski 4-vector for energy-momentum

$\displaystyle (m_0c)^2=(E/c)^2-p^2$ (12)

or alternatively

$\displaystyle (m_0c)^2=(\gamma m_0c)^2-(\gamma m_0v)^2$ (13)

in Euclidean form yields:

$\displaystyle (\gamma m_0c)^2=(m_0c)^2+(\gamma m_0v)^2$ (14)

The Euclidean form becomes transparent if the identity $ c=\gamma \chi$ is used:

$\displaystyle (\gamma m_0c)^2=(\gamma m_0\chi)^2+(\gamma m_0v)^2$ (15)

saying that the 4D momentum is the vector sum of spatial and proper time momentum. Equation (14) does however not yield an invariant. The factor $ \gamma$ , resulting from the Minkowski 4-velocity prohibits this. The Euclidean relativistic Lagrangian for a freely moving particle in 4D is a constant of motion (see also the derivation of Montanus in [2]), showing that, just as in the Euclidean 4-velocity, $ \gamma$ should be left out in the Euclidean form, which again yields $ m_0c$ as an invariant:

$\displaystyle (m_0c)^2=(m_0\chi)^2+(m_0v)^2$ (16)

Note that this is also consistent with the invariant nature of $ \alpha_E$ that was discussed in the previous Section.
Figure 5: Minkowski and Euclidean components for energy-momentum.
\begin{figure}\centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{4vecfig5.eps}}\end{figure}

Figure 5 again visualizes the geometries.


next up previous 13 15 Note: this is Euclidean relativity, not Minkowski.
Next: 5 Current density Up: Minkowski versus Euclidean 4-vectors Previous: 3 Acceleration
© Copyright 2005 R.F.J. van Linden